Why do Europe’s leaders want to turn our beautiful lands into a giant military camp cum prison colony, administered by printing press bankers? The trade is almost as bad as the one the Lenape made, trading the island of Manhattan for glass beads.

Giorgia Meloni and Elon Musk together in New York on Monday night.
FILIPPO ATTILI/US PALAZZO CHIGI PRESS OFFICE HANDOUT

Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni was feted recently at a swanky event in New York City held by the Atlantic Council.

I couldn’t get the lingering smell of rotting fish out of my nostrils for a few days after that. The Atlantic Council is the “NGO” par excellence when it comes to US foreign policy. According to the US Library of Congress, the Atlantic Council is:

> “…..a think tank in the field of international affairs. Founded in 1961, it provides a forum for international political, business, and intellectual leaders. It manages ten regional centers and functional programs related to international security and global economic prosperity. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C. It is a member of the Atlantic Treaty Association.”

It’s a very serious operation, and its funders read like a who’s who of very powerful global interests. Here is a small sample of their donors:

• British Foreign and Commonwealth Office
• Embassy of the United Arab Emirates
• Facebook
• Goldman Sachs & Co.
• The Rockefeller Foundation
• Abu Dhabi National Oil Company
• Airbus
• Chevron Corporation
• Google
• HSBC Holdings P.L.C.
• JPMorgan Chase Foundation
• Palantir
• Raytheon Company (now, Raytheon Technologies)
• US State Department
• Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs
• Army Future Studies Group
• Blackstone
• Burisma
• Embassy of Bahrain to the United States
• Embassy of Japan to the United States
• Eni SpA
• Lockheed Martin Corporation
• NATO Public Diplomacy Division
• NATO StratCom Center of Excellence
• Open Society Foundations
• etc.

Big Oil, Big Finance, Big Tech, weapons manufacturers, various governments and various government entities….they are all represented in this so-called “non-governmental organization” that is devoted to Atlanticism (read: continued US global hegemony).

Some of you may be thinking “so what? Italy is firmly within the Atlanticist orbit, and Meloni, as Premier of Italy, needs to represent her country at these events”.

Fair enough. On the other hand, many of you will recall that the Atlantic Council played a central role in the censorship regime forced onto/aided by Big Tech in the run up to the 2020 US Presidential Election, effectively tipping the scale in favour of Joe Biden’s candidacy. In 2018, the Atlantic Council partnered up with Facebook’s parent company Meta to create what is known as the Digital Forensic Research Lab. All of you here are aware that the US Government during Joe Biden’s administration funded efforts that resulted in government-backed calls for social media bans for certain American citizens, with many of the requests succeeding. You also already know the role that the USGov played in shaping the narratives around COVID-19, efforts that were assisted by the Digital Forensic Research Lab.

All of you should be aware that this outfit worked on behalf of government to monitor and censor online speech:

> The SIO’s role in monitoring and censoring online speech has garnered widespread political and legal scrutiny for stifling protected speech in conjunction with the federal government. The SIO-led so-called Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), composed of the University of Washington, Graphika Inc., and the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), silenced anti-mainstream narratives at the height of the 2020 presidential race in blatant disregard of the First Amendment. > > Emails from the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) reveal that the federal agency secretly collaborated with the EIP to censor vast amounts of speech deemed “threatening” and “dangerous” to its agenda. Journalist Matt Taibbi’s reporting detailed Stanford’s abandonment of free expression, open discourse, and intellectual diversity as it aided CISA in an unprecedented crackdown against political topics damaging to Democrats and the pro-lockdown left.

By now, some of you may be wondering why X owner Elon Musk would attend an event hosted by an organization that runs counter to his stated principles at X. I don’t have an answer to this, as Musk’s motivations are his own, and super billionaires reside in a different universe than us mere mortals. In my opinion, it’s not a good look….but my opinion does not appear on Elon’s radar.

My concerns here are focused on Giorgia Meloni, a populist who heads a party founded by neo-fascists, but who is now being celebrated by the powers-that-be, including those who seek to censor information on subjects such as mass migration, an issue where Meloni is supposed to be at complete odds with Atlanticism. What exactly is she trying to achieve here? Her flirtations with Brussels (the EU is firmly aligned with the Atlantic Council) resulted in her being spurned and publicly humiliated. So what gives?****

Thomas Fazi

**approaches the subject from the view of economics and Italy’s dissipating national sovereignty**:

> Taken together, then, you get the sense that Meloni gambled her political survival on shedding her populist image and rushing in the opposite direction, becoming more pro-European and more pro-American than your average European centrist. Now, however, the liberal media is aflame once more. Chatter about Meloni’s political journey started in September, when she was presented with a “Global Citizen Award” at the Atlantic Council in New York. Beyond the think tank’s Atlanticist flavour, what really got politicos talking was who gave Meloni her prize: one Elon Musk. This has fuelled speculation about a potential political (re)alignment with Trump on Meloni’s part. Given the mercurial South African’s financial and political support for Trump’s presidential run — and the (denied) allegations of a burgeoning romance between the businessman and the Prime Minister — these claims don’t feel completely fanciful.

Okay, no big deal so far. Not playing favourites in a foreign election is common sense.

Here’s where Fazi gets to his core argument:

> So could Meloni’s recent moves be signalling a return to her radical roots? I think not. At its core, rather, this story is less about policy — and more about cold hard cash, both in Italy itself and further afield. That’s clear enough if you put aside the trees, Meloni and Musk, and instead focus on the woods: the Atlantic Council that offered Meloni her prize. The think tank euphemistically describes itself as a nonpartisan organisation that “galvanises” US global leadership and encourages engagement with its friends and allies. In plain English, that means that the Atlantic Council exists to promote the interests of US corporations — and American imperial interests more generally. Founded in the Sixties, to boost political support for Nato, today it remains active on transatlantic security issues. 

The meat:

> Nor is Musk the only US investor ingratiating himself with Meloni. After returning from her bash in New York, she also met with Larry Fink, chairman and CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest investment company. With assets worth $10 trillion, the firm boasts the equivalent of Germany and Japan’s combined GDP. In Italy itself, BlackRock is comfortably the largest foreign institutional investor on the Milan Stock Exchange, owning substantial stakes in some of the country’s largest listed companies. The firm is bolstering its Italian presence elsewhere too. Earlier this year, for instance, Meloni oversaw the sale of Tim’s entire fixed-line network to KKR, a US fund that boasts BlackRock among its main institutional investors.  > > Beyond the fact that the network represents a strategic national asset, with its sensitive user data now effectively under foreign control, these varied moves represent the culmination of a long sequence of privatisations and selling-off of Italian public and private assets beginning back in the Nineties. Once you dovetail that with BlackRock’s future plans — among other things, it hopes to snatch up Italy’s highway and railway networks, currently under public or semi-public control — the country looks set to become little more than an outpost of American capital, losing what little is left of its economic sovereignty. 

Fazi makes the point that by Meloni selling off Italy’s economic crown jewels to US corporate, security, and financial interests, she is reducing her own country to the state of an economic dependency of the USA. Smart Europeans are worried about the continent’s economic decline, and there are strong calls for a strategy to create “European giants” in all economic sectors. By selling off such assets to the Americans, these efforts are instantly handicapped.

Italy as the USA’s “economic Trojan Horse”:

> That this should be happening under a nominally “sovereigntist” prime minister is remarkable enough — but what really matters is the way US investors, notably BlackRock, are using Italy as a Trojan horse to expand their influence right across Europe. Consider the example of Germany. Unlike other countries, companies in Munich or Hamburg largely remain in the hands of the families that founded them. Local investors have substantial influence too, as does KFW, the public bank dedicated to supporting the Federal Republic’s industrial development. > > In practice, that means the penetration of BlackRock and other US mega-funds in the German economy remains relatively marginal. That’s an anomaly that US capital now seems intent on fixing, using Italy as its battering ram. Last month, for instance, Milan’s UniCredit bank announced a surprise hostile takeover of Commerzbank, effectively becoming the Frankfurt outfit’s largest shareholder. Though this caused some patriotic fervour among Italian commentators — an Italian bank taking over a German rival! — the reality is that the move was likely spearheaded by BlackRock itself, which executed the move with the help of other Anglo-American funds, all to consolidate its control of Germany’s financial system. No wonder Larry Fink welcomed the move. “Europe,” he said, “needs a stronger capital markets system and a more unified banking system.” 

For obvious reasons, I don’t find the following quote by Todd to be entirely correct, but the gist of it certainly holds true:

> What we are witnessing, in short, is the economic cannibalisation of Europe by US capital. Not that we should be surprised. As Emmanuel Todd, a French historian, writes in his latest book: “As its power diminishes worldwide, the American system ultimately ends up burdening its protectorates more and more, as they remain the last bases of its power.” With European industry crucial to US interests, Todd continues, we should expect more “systemic exploitation” of Rome and Berlin from the imperial centre in Washington. The fact that this is happening under the auspices of a self-described “patriot” like Meloni only highlights the grotesque weakness of European politics.

No matter who moves into the White House in January of next year, Europe is going to be negatively affected by policies emanating from the ravenous US of A.

I’m a midlist-level author of unusual literature, and a political satirist, and a blogger, basically, and yet Facebook, and their partners at the Atlantic Council, and AstraZeneca, and Pfizer, and Moderna, and who knows which other global corporations and transnational, non-governmental entities like the WEF and WHO, consider someone of my lowly status enough of a threat to their “New Normal” narrative to warrant the attention of the Reality Police.

What happened to Hopkins is that he found that most who reposted his Facebook post "Impfen=Freiheit" (showing the Berlin tower with those words projected on it) found their accounts disabled and required to upload ID. This is the message many saw, accusing them of consorting with terrorists, mass murderers and human traffickers!

Platform monopoly was bad enough when Facebook was just spyware ¹ and Twitter was useful only as a kind of DM service for software writers to interact directly with each other.² Now that Facebook and Twitter are no longer neutral platforms but highly policed parts of the MSM, effectively a comments section for the MSM, the transformation of the internet world is almost complete. Rather than an open plain where ideas and innovations roam free, the online space is becoming a tightly fenced in corral.

No matter where you look, all the channels say the same thing again. Any dissenting voice is denied social media distribution. Social media and the internet have become a wonderful narrows from which to exercise control. CJ Hopkins calls reality-policing "ideological conformity".

And that is how reality-policing works. It’s a bullying operation, basically. The entire “cancel culture” phenomenon is. “Cancel culture” is a silly name for it. We are talking about a global empire imposing total ideological conformity (or, in simpler terms, its version of “reality”) on the entire planet through fear and force. The Nazis referred to this process as Gleichschaltung.

Sandy from the comments section tried reposting Hopkins’ "Impfang=Freiheit" graphic and had it deleted.

I made an experiment yesterday and reposted the Tower post shown above in FB to see what would happen. In my particular circumstance FB does not suspend me or notify me of anything. They just delete my stuff. I posted two items on the above article content and they just wiped it from my page without notice of any kind. For about 3 years i’ve noticed near zero distribution of my posts which are 95% political news. I have 500+ friends but less than a dozen and usually only 3 or 4 may respond. This is the silent blocking and throttling treatment that is probably what most are experiencing but don’t even know it’s happening. FB is social engineering of the very worst kind.

Basically if you do not support the current "reality" narrative you are silenced.

This is what Gleichshaltung is about. Drowning out any other voices except those which promote the party and its goals for the state. Humans are social animals. By silencing discussion, the state effectively controls 90% of the people who "get along to go along". Yes, we’re talking about the same 90% who supported dunking witches, the Spanish Inquisition and persecuting Galileo Galilei for heliocentrism in 1633. We know what happened to witches (if they sank they were not witches but drowned, if they floated, they were witches and were burned), Galileo suffered house-arrest until his death, the Third Reich generally condemned its dissidents to concentration camp. What does the "New Normal" have planned for dissidents?

Until now modern Western society has generally cut off contrarian voices economically. The most dangerous journalists seem to off themeslves with astonishing regularity. Those who are not dead are either in prison (Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning) or in exile (Edward Snowden) if they ran fast enough. Once on a wartime footing though, humans celebrate intolerance in those "on their side" and violently crush as a group any dissent.

Normals now perceive Assange and Snowden as enemies of the people and traitors who should be assassinated. It never ceases to astonish me that the war crimes brought to light by Assange and the illegal spying exposed by Snowden generate far less public indignation than Assange’s and Snowden’s exposure of those crimes.

[fvplayer id=”14″]

There’s clearly been a shift in the fabric of Western society visibly over the last five years, and in a creeping way since the G.W.Bush/Cheney presidency.³ In the last five years, the US Government and its "partners" like the Atlantic Council have been moving us to a wartime footing against Russia and China and Iran. There’s been incoherence in the shoves and pushes, one day pushing against Russia and the next week against China, once a month against Iran. The issue is not who is the enemy but which one who would like to take on first.⁴ The unifying theme though is one of active war.

We are basically on a pre-war footing now. The Atlantic Council has been invited to take control of social media, directly controlling standards on Facebook and advising Twitter. The Atlantic Council has never been a friendship group, but always a lobbyist for the drang nach Osten, which was supposed to have ended with the Second World War.

Current, honorary and lifetime Atlantic Council directors list reads like a bipartisan rogues gallery of American war-criminals, including Henry Kissinger, George P. Shultz, Madeline Albright, Frank Carlucci, James A. Baker, R. James Woolsey, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Robert Gates and Leon Panetta.

[fvplayer id=”13″]

Not only is it extremely disturbing is how well-financed the Atlantic Council is (though it always has appetite for more whether to spend on luxury travel or "fellowships" for compliant journalists – it’s amazing how much more appetising the words bribe, propaganda and war-mongering sound wrapped in a fellowship), it’s even more disturbing who is funding the Atlantic Council. The usual suspects such as Chevron, The Blackstone Group, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, BP, Exxon, the US State Department, Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs Trade & Development and Her Majesty’s Foreign office should surprise no one. On the other hand, it’s disturbing to see Google and Facebook as Strategic Partners and Twitter, 21st Century Fox, Microsoft as corporate partners. I would prefer to see social media and technology companies as neutral advocates of communication. Seeing them explicitly invest in propaganda ventures is disturbing.⁵

With Western governments on a war footing, the war-mongering Atlantic Council in charge of social media, our nominally free societies are entering a dark period of build-up to hot war. This means censorship, platform-banning and the total crushing of any dissent. ⁶

Did anyone sign up for the abolition of free speech during our lifetime? Silencing political discourse was certainly not on the curriculum during the 1980’s university of Toronto. As Canadians, we talked more about the importance of dialogue and maintaining a civil discourse, not about demonising and silencing those who disagree with us.

At least the future looks promising for dystopian authors.