<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monitor Calibration Software: basiCColor display 4 vs ICC ColorEyes 3.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html</link>
	<description>a winter in vienna. theatre, dance, poetry. and some politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyP</title>
		<link>http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html/comment-page-1#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncoy.org/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just switched to BasicColor 4 from Monaco Optix Pro.  Still using the Monaco puck (which is a DTP94 anyway!). 

Using on an Apple Cinema 20&quot; with BasicColor 4 set to L* 16bit LUT calibration and profiling at monitor native color temp. 

Under Optix Pro the best I could achieve was an average DeltaE of 1.2.  All patches under BasicColor 4 achieve an average DeltaE of 0.45. 136 Cd/m2 luminance, bp 0.20 Cd/m2 

The difference in shadow detail is a revelation.  Using the Dry Creek black point test my Cinema is now showing a visible difference at level 3.  Under Monaco it was level 9.

I&#039;de certainly recommend BasicColor 4.  i&#039;ve owned the Spyder series, the monaco Optix Pro package and now this software - it&#039;s the best of the bunch by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just switched to BasicColor 4 from Monaco Optix Pro.  Still using the Monaco puck (which is a DTP94 anyway!). </p>
<p>Using on an Apple Cinema 20&#8243; with BasicColor 4 set to L* 16bit LUT calibration and profiling at monitor native color temp. </p>
<p>Under Optix Pro the best I could achieve was an average DeltaE of 1.2.  All patches under BasicColor 4 achieve an average DeltaE of 0.45. 136 Cd/m2 luminance, bp 0.20 Cd/m2 </p>
<p>The difference in shadow detail is a revelation.  Using the Dry Creek black point test my Cinema is now showing a visible difference at level 3.  Under Monaco it was level 9.</p>
<p>I&#8217;de certainly recommend BasicColor 4.  i&#8217;ve owned the Spyder series, the monaco Optix Pro package and now this software &#8211; it&#8217;s the best of the bunch by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic W. Erk</title>
		<link>http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html/comment-page-1#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic W. Erk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncoy.org/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html#comment-247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am using basICColor 4 in combination with X-Rite DTP94. The profiling results appear more consistent than those achieved with X-Rite own software, which is rendering colours too much in the red. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have read excellent reviews about ColorEyes, and if I recall correctly, both ColorEyes and basICColor have a common origin.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The gold standard to display calibration appears to be ColorFacts, but the price is only appealing to professional studios.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have done quite a lot of research in terms of calibration methods. You must also take into account the fact that your display may or may not render colors in a way compatible with basICColor profiling. I don&#039;t want to mean negative, but I am very cautious with LCD in terms of color rendering, even if those have become pretty good lately.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All my displays are analog CRTs, mainly Sony, Philips and Eizo. Since I am an Apple user too, I am of course very much attracted to the Cinema Display series, even if Apple has been lately subjected to criticism in terms of promised colour fidelity.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using basICColor 4 in combination with X-Rite DTP94. The profiling results appear more consistent than those achieved with X-Rite own software, which is rendering colours too much in the red. </p>
<p>I have read excellent reviews about ColorEyes, and if I recall correctly, both ColorEyes and basICColor have a common origin.</p>
<p>The gold standard to display calibration appears to be ColorFacts, but the price is only appealing to professional studios.</p>
<p>I have done quite a lot of research in terms of calibration methods. You must also take into account the fact that your display may or may not render colors in a way compatible with basICColor profiling. I don&#8217;t want to mean negative, but I am very cautious with LCD in terms of color rendering, even if those have become pretty good lately.</p>
<p>All my displays are analog CRTs, mainly Sony, Philips and Eizo. Since I am an Apple user too, I am of course very much attracted to the Cinema Display series, even if Apple has been lately subjected to criticism in terms of promised colour fidelity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncoy.org/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html#comment-246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Andre,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The software works a treat, but their commercial process is a real mess. I still don&#039;t have my full licenses (I have to follow up again with grafixgear). But it shouldn&#039;t be this difficult.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I recommend, as you are in Ottawa that you give Jon Meyer a call at grafixgear. He might be able to set you up with a demo license directly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let me know how it goes and how the software works for you. I have been able to get very, very good profiles with basiCColor with a minimum of hassle once the software is running even on the wretched Powerbook screens.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Andre,</p>
<p>The software works a treat, but their commercial process is a real mess. I still don&#8217;t have my full licenses (I have to follow up again with grafixgear). But it shouldn&#8217;t be this difficult.</p>
<p>I recommend, as you are in Ottawa that you give Jon Meyer a call at grafixgear. He might be able to set you up with a demo license directly.</p>
<p>Let me know how it goes and how the software works for you. I have been able to get very, very good profiles with basiCColor with a minimum of hassle once the software is running even on the wretched Powerbook screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Dumas</title>
		<link>http://uncoy.com/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html/comment-page-1#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Dumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncoy.org/2006/04/basiccolor_disp.html#comment-245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been trying to install the basICColor Display 4.0 tryout and it has been a *total nightmare* their system just keeps forcing me into a never ending circle, asking me:  &quot; get a 14 day licence, installing in the correct folder, starting the software and when I get to the point of generating the profile it asks me to get a 14 day licence .... (back to square one) etc. etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Their web site insists on serving me in French and gives me no other option and their French is *absolutely full* of spelling errors ...(?) One has to wonder about a company that is so incoherent, their website is graphically beautiful, the programming so poor!  Can this product be that good?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Andre Dumas&lt;br /&gt;
Ottawa, Canada&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to install the basICColor Display 4.0 tryout and it has been a *total nightmare* their system just keeps forcing me into a never ending circle, asking me:  &#8221; get a 14 day licence, installing in the correct folder, starting the software and when I get to the point of generating the profile it asks me to get a 14 day licence &#8230;. (back to square one) etc. etc.</p>
<p>Their web site insists on serving me in French and gives me no other option and their French is *absolutely full* of spelling errors &#8230;(?) One has to wonder about a company that is so incoherent, their website is graphically beautiful, the programming so poor!  Can this product be that good?</p>
<p>Andre Dumas<br />
Ottawa, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

